My friend Tom Hollingsworth has written another NAT66-is-evil blog post. While I agree with him in principle, and most everyone agrees NAT as we know it from IPv4 world is plain stupid in IPv6 world (NAPT more so than NAT), we just might need NPT66 (Network Prefix Translation; RFC 6296) to support small-site multihoming ... and yet again, it seems that many leading IPv6 experts grudgingly agree with me.
Read more ...Thanks for reading my news about We just might need NAT66 at my blog Bros Droid if you want too share this article, please put the resource, and if you think this article is very usefully dont forget to bookmark this site with CTRL + D on your keyboard to web browser.
More Articles :
The best of RIPE65- Do you need IPsec to run IPv6?
- IPv6 security webinar
- Choose your networking equipment with RIPE-554
- Analyst-driven IPv6 deployment
- State of IPv6 in the Data Center Gear
- IPv6-only Data Center (built by Tore Anderson)
- You MUST take control of IPv6 in your network
- IPv6 over PPPoE works great with IOS XE 3.7
- HTTP-over-IPv6 on Cisco IOS