My friend Tom Hollingsworth has written another NAT66-is-evil blog post. While I agree with him in principle, and most everyone agrees NAT as we know it from IPv4 world is plain stupid in IPv6 world (NAPT more so than NAT), we just might need NPT66 (Network Prefix Translation; RFC 6296) to support small-site multihoming ... and yet again, it seems that many leading IPv6 experts grudgingly agree with me.
Read more ...Thanks for reading my news about We just might need NAT66 at my blog Bros Droid if you want too share this article, please put the resource, and if you think this article is very usefully dont forget to bookmark this site with CTRL + D on your keyboard to web browser.
More Articles :
Compromised Security Zone = Game Over (Or Not?)- IPv6 Source Address Validation Improvement
- Happy Eyeballs – Happiness Defined by Your Perspective
- IPv6 Address Assignment and Tracking
- The Dangers of Ignoring IPv6
- Cisco IOS TCP MSS handling on IPv6
- Watch Tore Anderson Describing IPv6-Only Data Centers
- IPv6 uRPF and Neighbor Discovery Throttling
- First-Hop IPv6 Security Features in Cisco IOS
- 464XLAT Explained