The proponents of Network Prefix Translation for IPv6 (NPT66) usually claim it’s required for one of the two reasons: to implement multihoming without BGP (valid) and to avoid renumbering inside network(s) when the ISP assigns you a new IPv6 prefix. Let’s focus on the renumbering claim today.
Read more ...Thanks for reading my news about IPv6 static addresses and renumbering at my blog Bros Droid if you want too share this article, please put the resource, and if you think this article is very usefully dont forget to bookmark this site with CTRL + D on your keyboard to web browser.
More Articles :
IPv6 On-Link Determination – What Is It And Why Do We Need It?- Do We Need FHRP (HSRP or VRRP) For IPv6?
- Reconnaissance in IPv6
- DHCPv6-based address allocation on PPPoE links
- IPv6 deployment IETF drafts
- MTU issues (and TCP MSS clamping) in residential IPv6 deployments
- IPv6 Prefixes Longer Than /64 Might Be Harmful
- More real-life DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation gotchas
- IPv6 Router Advertisements Deep Dive
- Router Advertisement (RA) Guard on Cisco IOS