The proponents of Network Prefix Translation for IPv6 (NPT66) usually claim it’s required for one of the two reasons: to implement multihoming without BGP (valid) and to avoid renumbering inside network(s) when the ISP assigns you a new IPv6 prefix. Let’s focus on the renumbering claim today.
Read more ...Thanks for reading my news about IPv6 static addresses and renumbering at my blog Bros Droid if you want too share this article, please put the resource, and if you think this article is very usefully dont forget to bookmark this site with CTRL + D on your keyboard to web browser.
More Articles :
Do We Need FHRP (HSRP or VRRP) For IPv6?- IPv6 Secure Neighbor Discovery (SEND)
- Router Advertisement (RA) Guard on Cisco IOS
- MTU issues (and TCP MSS clamping) in residential IPv6 deployments
- All You Ever Wanted to Know About IPv6-over-IPv4 Tunnels
- Keep your applications running on IPv6 transition
- IPv6 addressing in SMB environment
- DHCPv6-based address allocation on PPPoE links
- IPv6 Prefixes Longer Than /64 Might Be Harmful
- Predicting the IPv6 BGP table size